Ricigliano v. Peat, Marwick, Main & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is within a trial court’s discretion to grant stay in subsequently filed state action where the allegations in previously filed federal action are the same, notwithstanding a disparity in the parties to the two actions
• staying of second- filed Florida action in deference to substantially similar federal case
• state and federal actions were sufficiently similar to warrant the trial court's stay of the subsequently filed state action
• disparity in parties between two actions did not require denial of stay where the basis for the two actions were the same
• within trial court’s discretion to grant stay in subsequently filed state action where the allegations in previously filed federal action are the same, notwithstanding a disparity in the parties to the two actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).