Skip to main content
· 3/15/1875

Richter v. Wise

Citations

  • 6 Thomp. & Cook 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a motion to compel arbitration filed in 5 a pending lawsuit is an “action on the contract” for purposes of section 1717 and that a defendant 6 who successfully compels arbitration is a prevailing party who may immediately seek attorneys’ 7 fees
  • does not make sense to distinguish between a petition to compel 15 arbitration as an independent proceeding vs. one filed in a pending case, and neither is it 16 significant if the fee-shifting provision is specific to the arbitration provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.