Richter v. Richter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing when the statute of limitations begins to run on judgments for spousal support payments
• “It has been held that, since a divorce decree providing for the payment of alimony is a continuing order, the enforcement thereof cannot be barred by laches, and that mere lapse of time alone will not suffice to defeat a claim for alimony due.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kinsella v. Kinsella
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-12-04· cited 56×
• Nugent v. Nugent
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1967-07-07· cited 41×
• Marriage of Benedict v. Benedict
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-29· cited 20×
• Catlett v. Catlett
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1966-03-22· cited 19×
• Fuson v. Schaible
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-12-30· cited 18×
• Flannery v. Flannery
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-02-22· cited 16×
• Stenehjem, ex rel. v. National Audubon Society, Inc.
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-04-08· cited 14×
• Faribault-Martin-Watonwan Human Services Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Jacobson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-02-26· cited 13×
• Eggers v. Eggers
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1967-10-02· cited 12×
• Blomdahl v. Blomdahl
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-04-13· cited 11×
• Martin v. Rath
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-02-23· cited 10×
• Marriage of Miller v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-07-09· cited 9×
• Glass v. Glass
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-02-16· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. City of Los Angeles
  California Court of Appeal· 1944-10-31· cited 39×
• Hopkins v. Hopkins
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-02-18· cited 15×
• Ulman v. Ulman
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1907-05-18· cited 7×