Richter v. City of Omaha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unfavorable inference where “spoliation or destruction was intentional and indicates fraud and a desire to suppress the truth”
• “presumption or inference arises, however, only where the spoliation or destruction was intentional and indicates fraud and a desire to suppress the truth, and it does not arise where the destruction was a matter of routine with no fraudulent intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).