Skip to main content
· 3/9/2004

Richmond v. Indalex Inc.

Citations

  • 308 F. Supp. 2d 648
  • 2004 WL 473652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing whether, on a motion to dismiss, Plaintiff has alleged facts sufficient to establish derivative liability and pierce defendant’s corporate veil

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beaty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.