Skip to main content
· 5/14/1980

Richmond v. Dofflemyer

Citations

  • 105 Cal. App. 3d 745
  • 164 Cal. Rptr. 727
  • 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court refused to consider capital gains tax consequences in a partition action, because “if respondents choose to sell the property awarded to them in the future, they will face capital gains tax consequences at that time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Condley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.