Richmond v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• parolee \cannot avoid service of his remaining back time simply because the running of the minimum on the new sentence coincides with the Board's implementation of its revocation decision\
• “Although petitioner is correct in noting that Section (continued . . .) sentence. Wilson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 124 A.3d 767, 770 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Campbell v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-11· cited 80×
• Wilson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-08-11· cited 58×
• Commonwealth v. Dorian
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-27· cited 17×
• Simpson v. Commonwealth Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-04

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. CUYLER
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-16· cited 33×
• Kuykendall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-07· cited 26×
• Young v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-15· cited 19×
• Choice v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-05-11· cited 17×
• Carter v. RAPONE
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-08· cited 9×