Richmond Oil Equipment Co. v. W. T. Holt, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 1963 provides “a speedier and more efficient mechanism for the enforcement of federal judgments” than the practice of obtaining a judgment on a judgment
• denying enforcement of an injunction in a New York court that was issued by an Ohio court because 15 “[v]iolation of an injunctive order is cognizable in the court which issued the injunction”
• “The mandate of an injunction issued by a federal district court runs throughout the United States.”
• “[A] suit on a 12 judgment [rendered by a federal court exercising federal question jurisdiction] 13 does not involve a federal question, however important federal questions may 14 have been to the resolution of the original controversy.”
• “[A] suit on a 12 judgment [rendered by a federal court exercising federal question jurisdiction] 13 does not involve a federal question, however important federal questions may 14 have been to the resolution of the original controversy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).