Richmond Mill, Inc. v. Ferraro

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 585

Syllabus

two appellants seek reconsideration of decision that any interests they had in minerals was extinguished under the Marketable Title Act while the interests of two other appellants were not extinguished as were in continuous possession for more than 40 years at the time they filed preservation notices reconsideration denied as the two movants did not satisfy continuous possession provision appellees' cross-application for reconsideration denied as two appellants satisfied continuous possession provision.