Richmond Lumber Co. v. Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• faulting an 16 ALJ’s “global references to multi-page exhibits, without pinpoint citations to specific pages”; “This court is neither required nor inclined to scour the 17 record in an attempt to divine the specific basis for an ALJ’s opinion.”
• “This court is neither required nor inclined to scour the record in an attempt to divine the specific basis for an ALJ’s opinion, and I thus repeatedly have found that such general citations do not substantiate the ALJ’s disability decision.”
• “the ALJ’s apparent conclusion that findings of normal strength, sensation, and reflexes were inconsistent with the limitations [the treating physician] suggested is hardly obvious, and certainly not one that the ALJ (or this court, for that matter) is qualified to make”
• giving “partial weight” to Dr. Iannotti’s opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).