Skip to main content
· 1/30/1890

Richmond & Danville R. R. v. Payne

Citations

  • 86 Va. 481
  • 6 L.R.A. 849
  • 10 S.E. 749
  • 1890 Va. LEXIS 8

Syllabus

<p>1. Common Carriers—Limiting liability.—By Code 1887, sec. 1296, no agreement to exem]}t a common carrier from liability for injury or loss occasioned by his own neglect or misconduct shall be valid, yet the weight of authority favors the proposition that a carrier may by special agreement, fairly made in consideration of a reduced rate of transportation, limit his liability to a certain amount, less than the value of the property, in case of loss or damage occurring through his negligence.</p> <p>2. Practice at common law—Bill of particulars.—If the declaration clearly state the cause of action relied on, there is no error in refusing to order a bill of particulars.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • decedent, acting in conjunction with his wife and daughter, had the power to determine the ultimate distribution of the proceeds of the insurance policy and this power was an incident of ownership

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.