Richmond & D. R. Co. v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the petitioner’s claim that “dire consequences ... would befall it if” certain events were to transpire was insufficient to “state an injury sufficiently imminent and concrete for constitutional standing”
• holding that the petitioner’s claim that “dire consequences . . . would befall it if” certain events were to transpire was insufficient to “state an injury sufficiently imminent and concrete for constitutional standing”
• stating that “[i]f, at some later time, one or more of the parties develops a justiciable claim, they will be able to seek judicial relief”
• \Our standing inquiry focuses on the appropriateness of a party bringing the questioned controversy to the court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).