Skip to main content
· 2/5/1896

Richmond & D. R. Co. v. Chester & L. N. G. R. Co.

Citations

  • 71 F. 432
  • 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1615
  • 17 C.C.A. 672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering, in addition to the original Polaroid factors, the nature of the senior user’s priority, the senior user’s delay in asserting its claim, and the harm to the junior user against the benefit to the senior user that would result from the requested injunction
  • \sophistication of the buyers\ must be considered
  • “sophistication of the buyers” must be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.