Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 7/15/2002

Richland County v. Kaiser

Citations

  • 567 S.E.2d 260
  • 351 S.C. 89
  • 2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is the substance of the relief sought that matters regardless of its form
  • reversing the award of attorney's fees because based on this court's reversal of the trial court's findings, the respondents were no longer the prevailing parties
  • reversing the award of attorney's fees because based on this court's reversal of the trial court's findings, the respondents were no longer the prevailing parties
  • reversing the award of attorney's fees when, based on this court's reversal of the circuit court's findings, the respondents were no longer the prevailing parties
  • \An injunction is an equitable remedy that may be used to require a party to perform an action.\
  • “An abuse of discretion occurs when a court’s decision is controlled by an error of law or is without evidentiary support.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hearn, Huff, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.