Richins v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when Pennsylvania’s choice-of-law rules apply, the longest possible statute of limitations is Pennsylvania’s
• noting that there, the particular contractual standing issues asserted by the parties might not even implicate Article III standing at all
• explaining that a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction should be without prejudice as the court has not expressed a view of the plaintiff’s claims on the merits
• explaining that a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction should be without prejudice as the court has not expressed a view of the plaintiff’s claims on the merits
• explaining that a dismissal on jurisdictional grounds must be without prejudice
• applying Pennsylvania’s long-arm statute and reasoning that “[t]he statutory inquiry in this case thus merges with the constitutional one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).