Skip to main content
· 9/3/1974

Richins v. Industrial Construction, Inc.

Citations

  • 502 F.2d 1051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that under a United States copyright regulation, “typeface is an industrial design in which the design cannot exist independently and separately as a work of art”
  • noting the “precise line between copyrightable works of applied art and uncopyrighted works of industrial design”
  • noting the “precise line between copyrightable works of applied art and uncopy-righted works of industrial design”
  • typeface not subject to copyright protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.