Skip to main content

Richie v. State

Citations

  • 358 S.E.2d 648
  • 183 Ga. App. 248
  • 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the victim’s reluctance to actually name the sex organ did not preclude the jury from reasonably inferring that the “something” defendant assaulted her with was his sexual organ
  • ruling that the victim’s reluctance to actually name the sex organ did not preclude the jury from reasonably inferring that the “something” defendant assaulted her with was his sexual organ
  • \[T]he jury could reasonably infer that the 'something' defendant assaulted the victim with was his sexual organ and that the evidence was sufficient for a rational factfinder to find the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of rape.\
  • “[T]he jury could reasonably infer that the ‘something’ defendant assaulted the victim with was his sexual organ and that the evidence was sufficient for a rational factfinder to find the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of rape.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley, Birdsong, Been, McMurray, Banke, Pope, Benham, Carley, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.