Skip to main content
· 2/18/1930

Richfield Nat. Bank of Richfield v. American Surety Co. of New York

Citations

  • 39 F.2d 387
  • 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for resentencing with- out conducting element-matching analysis where the state had not carried its burden, because it did not establish the elements of defendant’s out-of-state offense nor that that offense matched an Oregon offense
  • “Whether an offense is a lesser included [offense] of a charged crime depends on whether (1) one offense is necessarily included within the other because the elements of the former are subsumed in the latter or (2
  • “Whether an offense is a lesser included of a charged crime depends on whether (1) one offense is necessarily included within the other because the elements of the former are subsumed in the latter or (2
  • “Whether an offense is a lesser included of a charged crime depends on whether (1) one offense is necessarily included within the other because the elements of the former are subsumed in the latter or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reeves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.