Skip to main content
· 9/9/2010

Richelson v. Yost

Citations

  • 738 F. Supp. 2d 589
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94374
  • 2010 WL 3563108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing a complaint where the plaintiff failed to plead facts sufficient to meet state law demand requirements
  • dismissing a claim which failed to meet the Rule 23.1(b) pleading requirements without prejudice
  • dismissing a complaint under Rule 23.1(b) failure to comply with state demand requirements
  • granting a motion to dismiss without prejudice and denying a motion for sanctions
  • “Here Quantum alleges it ‘demanded that [Apex’s BOD] take the action(s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eduardo C. Robreno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.