· 9/9/2010
Richelson v. Yost
Citations
- 738 F. Supp. 2d 589
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94374
- 2010 WL 3563108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing a complaint where the plaintiff failed to plead facts sufficient to meet state law demand requirements
- dismissing a claim which failed to meet the Rule 23.1(b) pleading requirements without prejudice
- dismissing a complaint under Rule 23.1(b) failure to comply with state demand requirements
- granting a motion to dismiss without prejudice and denying a motion for sanctions
- “Here Quantum alleges it ‘demanded that [Apex’s BOD] take the action(s
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eduardo C. Robreno
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.