Richelle Marie Whitenack v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when reviewing de novo the dismissal of a complaint, this Court is neither bound by nor even concerned with why the trial court reached its result but rather considers anew the legal sufficiency of the complaint
• “any error in failing to convert the motion ‘is harmless if the dismissal can be justified under [Rule] 12(b)(6) standards without consideration of the matters outside the pleadings.’” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).