Richart v. Goodpaster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that §§ 15, 29(b) together provide both a private right and private remedy
• “In light of the referenced pre-1975 cases law … the Court agrees with Plaintiff’s preferred construction.”
• “Although a court must construe the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff as the nonmoving party, ‘a plaintiff’s version of the facts must find support in the record.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).