Richardson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that benefits for total disability are allowed in addition to specific loss benefits where the specific loss injury directly results in a disability that is separate and distinct from that which normally follows such injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Southwest Airlines/Cambridge Integrated Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-04· cited 22×
• Pocono Mountain School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-04-10· cited 22×
• Crews v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-01-19· cited 13×
• R.G. Kinzler, Trustee of a Trust for the Benefit of K. Kinzler v. WCAB (Assoc. for Vascular Access & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.)
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-01-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-04· cited 260×
• Lente v. Luci
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-06-24· cited 130×
• Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-29· cited 53×
• Truck Lubricating & Washing Co. v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-11-10· cited 19×
• LaChina v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-14· cited 9×
• School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-30· cited 8×
• Mosier v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-07· cited 3×