Appellate Court of Illinois· 10/7/1993
Richardson v. Vaughn
Citations
- 622 N.E.2d 53
- 251 Ill. App. 3d 403
- 190 Ill. Dec. 643
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding it unreasonable to require defendant to anticipate that plaintiff, while engaged in physical activities associated with an outdoor picnic, \would blind himself to the probable consequences of his own actions\
- distraction exception did not save the plaintiff’s claim against defendant-athletic club where he tripped over cable while running full speed and looking at people with water balloons, rather than looking forward
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.