Richardson v. Tennessee Board of Dentistry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the chancery court's resolution of certain issues in the first chancery court proceeding, from which the appellant did not appeal, barred reconsideration of those issues
• holding that while the denial of a motion to dismiss is not a final, immediately appealable judgment, it may be raised in an appeal following a final judgment
• holding that while the denial of a motion to dismiss is not a final, immediately appealable judgment, it may be raised in an appeal following a final judgment
• noting that T.C.A. § 63-1-134 authorizes health related boards to assess civil penalties against “unlicensed practitioners in health related professions”
• directing that “administrative tribunals ‘have no authority to determine the facial constitutionality of a statute.’”
• determining that an order was final because it “conclusively determined all issues before the [trial court] on their merits and left nothing for further judgment of that court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).