Supreme Court of Georgia· 1/22/2019
Richardson v. State
Citations
- 823 S.E.2d 321
- 304 Ga. 900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- while prosecutor’s remark during closing was “troubling,” defendant could not demonstrate prejudice from counsel’s failure to object
- “[E]ven assuming that trial counsel was deficient for failing to object [to a ‘troubling’ 22 statement in closing argument], Appellant has failed to demonstrate prejudice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Wesley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-01-25· cited 208×
- Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-15· cited 75×
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-03-05· cited 73×
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-03-10· cited 53×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-04-29· cited 39×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-01-23· cited 34×
- Menefee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-06-19· cited 29×
- Slaton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-05-07· cited 24×
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-11-03· cited 18×
- Lamar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-05-11· cited 17×
- Kidd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-01-07· cited 15×
- Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-01-28· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.