Skip to main content

Richardson v. State

Citations

  • 715 S.E.2d 774
  • 311 Ga. App. 369
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2670
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s order denying defendant’s speedy-trial claim, which did not include any findings of fact or conclusions of law, was insufficient to provide for appellate review
  • holding that trial court’s order denying defendant’s speedy-trial claim, which did not include any findings of fact or conclusions of law, was insufficient to provide for appellate review
  • holding that trial court’s order denying defendant’s speedy-trial claim was insufficient for review given that it included no findings of fact and given that trial court did not incorporate in its order a transcript containing verbal findings of fact
  • holding that trial court’s order denying defendant’s speedy-trial claim was insufficient for review given that it included no findings of fact and given that trial court did not incorporate in its order a transcript containing verbal findings of fact
  • vacating and remanding for entry of a proper order under Barker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Andrews, McFadden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.