Richardson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that court is under a duty to exercise its discretion to order sentence to run concurrently or consecutively to prior sentence, despite pending control release violation
• \[A] trial court may order a sentence to run concurrently or consecutively to a -8- pending control-release violation.\ (citing Scantling, 711 So. 2d at 525-26)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bivins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-06· cited 3×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-10· cited 2×
• WIDEMOND v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-29· cited 2×
• Shorter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-08· cited 2×
• Ford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-06· cited 1×
• JAY LARSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-20· cited 1×
• Walden v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-05-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-24· cited 163×
• Pearson v. Moore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-14· cited 17×
• Scantling v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-05-21· cited 13×
• McCarthur v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-16· cited 6×
• Krause v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-17· cited 5×
• Byrd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-03· cited 4×