Richardson v. Stanley Works, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[Hyde] concedes that Harper [v. Va. Dep’t of Taxation
• \[I]n § 2254 proceedings a court must assess the prejudicial impact of constitutional error in a state-court criminal trial under the 'substantial and injurious effect' standard set forth in [Brecht v. Abrahamson
• \[I]n § 2254 proceedings a court must assess the prejudicial impact of constitutional error in a state-court criminal trial under the `substantial and injurious effect' standard set forth in [ Brecht v. Abrahamson
• \[O]ur holding in Lockhart [v. Fretwell
• \A major goal of the valuation process in eminent domain proceedings is to determine market conditions for the taken property as though no condemnation had ever been contemplated.” (Citing State v. Heirs of Kapahi
• noting that “discounting of functional elements must not convert the overall infringement test to an element-by-element comparison”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).