Richardson v. STANDARD GUAR. INS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the filed rate doctrine did not bar a claim “that the insurer breached the policy as written”
• holding that the filed rate doctrine did not bar a claim \that the insurer breached the policy as written\
• holding that the filed rate doctrine precludes insured's fraudulent inducement claim
• holding that the filed rate doctrine applies to the insurance industry, and noting “the considerable weight of authority from other jurisdictions that have applied the filed rate doctrine to ratemaking in the insurance industry”
• noting that \a determination as to the manner in which the filed rate doctrine impacts upon plaintiff's complaint requires an examination of the asserted causes of action\
• noting that “a determination as to the manner in which the filed rate doctrine impacts upon plaintiffs complaint requires an examination of the asserted causes of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).