Skip to main content
· 2/8/2011

Richardson v. Sexual Assault/Spouse Abuse Resource Center, Inc.

Citations

  • 764 F. Supp. 2d 736
  • 84 Fed. R. Serv. 821
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12822
  • 2011 WL 442111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an unlicenced counsel- or working under the supervision of a licensed social worker had standing to assert the privilege on behalf of the patient
  • no waiver where the defendants objected to discovery on confidentiality grounds, the Court directed the defendants to instead object on privilege grounds and particularize its claims, and the defendants specified their privilege claims five months after their initial objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul W. Grimm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.