Richardson v. Richardson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that HRS § 580-47(a) “takes precedence over [the provision] terminati[ng] ... Father’s child support obligation when the children reach the age of 18”
• noting that Hawaii statute permitted deviation from child support guidelines if amount higher than reasonable needs of child would result from high parental income
• noting Hawaii statute permitting deviation from child support guidelines if amount higher than reasonable needs of child would result from high parental income
• describing 1988 and 1989 Guidelines
• describing 1988 and 1989 Guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Leeder v. Leeder
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-08-01· cited 18×
• Herrmann v. Herrmann.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2016-06-28· cited 10×
• Mark v. Mark
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1992-05-01· cited 9×
• P.O. v. J.S.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-04-06· cited 6×
• Child Support Enforcement Agency v. Mazzone
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1998-05-26· cited 5×
• Finley v. Scott
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-07· cited 5×
• DeMello v. DeMello
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1998-03-10· cited 3×
• Bridgman v. Bridgman
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2009-07-30
• Bayley v. Bayley
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2009-08-31
• PO v. JS.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-04-06

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Jane Doe VI v. Richard Roe VI
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1987-04-21· cited 11×