Supreme Court of Alabama· 2/5/1988
Richardson v. Kroger Co.
Citations
- 521 So. 2d 934
- 1988 WL 20332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- focus of inquiry in slip and fall case involving store is whether storekeeper acted reasonably in discovering and removing foreign objects from floor, not on chosen method of displaying and packaging goods
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torbert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-02-26· cited 58×
- Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-03· cited 47×
- Maddox by and Through Maddox v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-05-18· cited 46×
- Cox v. Western Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1989-11-17· cited 37×
- King v. Winn-Dixie of Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-03-23· cited 28×
- Speer v. Pin Palace Bowling AlleySupreme Court of Alabama· 1992-05-29· cited 16×
- RIVERVIEW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1995-06-30· cited 10×
- E.S.R. v. Madison County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-03-28· cited 10×
- Havens v. TrawickSupreme Court of Alabama· 1990-06-01· cited 10×
- Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.M.D. Alabama· 2008-10-20· cited 10×
- Graham v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-07-01· cited 9×
- Knox v. United StatesM.D. Alabama· 2013-10-16· cited 4×
- Cummings v. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1989-03-24· cited 2×
- Owens v. Food World, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1995-08-11· cited 1×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. IrbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2000-06-30· cited 1×
- Green v. Wal-Mart Store No. 863, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-09-21
- Bowman v. Fort Rucker National BankSupreme Court of Alabama· 1994-08-05
- Foster v. Church's Chicken of Mobile 1620Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1999-08-20
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Van T. Junkins and Associates, Inc., an Alabama Corporation v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1984-07-17· cited 443×
- Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-02-20· cited 152×
- Bozza v. Vornado, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-06-01· cited 118×
- Fountain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1981-09-18· cited 94×
- Butler v. Michigan Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1981-08-21· cited 78×
- United States v. Philip HollingerSeventh Circuit· 1977-06-03· cited 62×
- Campbell v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1979-12-21· cited 59×
- Whatley v. Cardinal Pest ControlSupreme Court of Alabama· 1980-09-19· cited 51×
- SH Kress & Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1957-10-24· cited 48×
- Arrington v. Working Woman's HomeSupreme Court of Alabama· 1979-02-23· cited 43×
- Lingerfelt v. Winn-Dixie Texas, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1982-03-23· cited 41×
- Lady Corinne Trawlers, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-05-08· cited 30×
- Ruth Hetzel v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1972-03-28· cited 25×
- Imperial Group, Ltd. v. Lamar Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1977-07-08· cited 25×
- May-Bilt, Inc. v. DeeseSupreme Court of Alabama· 1967-12-21· cited 25×
- Adriance v. Henry Duncan Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-06-24· cited 20×
- Winn-Dixie Store No. 1501 v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1981-02-04· cited 18×
- Clayton v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1984-08-24· cited 18×
- Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-09-01· cited 17×
- Isbell v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1985-07-19· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.