Richardson v. Korson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prejudice may be cured by allowing the opposing party an opportunity to depose an expert regarding a late filed disclosure
• requiring plaintiff to pay costs of deposition after plaintiff did not comply with Rule 26(a
• “[Rule 26(e)] does not grant a license to supplement a previously filed expert report because a party wants to.” (quotations omitted)
• “[Rule 26(e)] does not grant a license to supplement a previously filed expert report because a party wants to.” (quotations omitted)
• “[Rule 26(e)] does not grant a license to supplement a previously filed expert report because a party wants to.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).