Richardson v. Kelly
Citations
- 85 Ill. 491
Syllabus
<p>1. Witness—impeachment by proof of contrary statements. The rule is inflexible, that a witness can not be impeached by proof of his having made contradictory statements out of court, unless his attention has been directed, in his examination, to such statements, specifying particularly the time and place.</p> <p>2. G-amxng—action to recover thing lost. In trover to recover the value of a mare lost on a wager upon a horse race, it is error in an instruction to make the plaintiff'’s right to recover depend upon the fact that the animal was taken against the will and protest of the plaintiff. The action lies, although the plaintiff may have voluntarily given possession.</p>
Judges: Soholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Richardson v. Kelly
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.