Richardson v. Green
Citations
- 130 U.S. 104
- 9 S. Ct. 443
- 32 L. Ed. 872
- 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1730
Syllabus
<p>It is a well settled rule that this court will not entertain’ an appeal where the transcript of the record is not filed in- this .court at the term next succeeding the taking of the appeal, unless a- recognized satisfactory excuse for the laches is niade.</p> <p>It is not a sufficient excuse that the clerk of the court below was mistaken in his understanding as to the time when the' transcript must be filed, and that it was prepared as soon as possible by him, having due regard to the other duties of his office, and the size of the record.</p> <p>Where the transcript of the record was placed in the hands of the clerk of this court at the next' term after the appeal was allowed and perfected by the filing of a bond, but no appearance was entered for the appellant, nor any deposit for costs made, at that term, but these things were done at the next following term, and the case was then docketed, and a motion to dismiss the appeal -was made at the third term thereafter: Held, that the motion must be denied.</p> <p>Where an appeal is allowed in open court at the same term the decree is made yet if the bond to perfect the appeal is not accepted at or during that term, a citation is necessary.</p> <p>The issuing of a citation may be- waived by the .appellee, and a general appearance by him is a waiver of a citation.</p> <p>Where this' court has jurisdiction of an appeal, and a citation is necessary, it will issue one.</p> <p>Reasons stated why the appeal in this case is not open to the objection that it does not involve more than $5000, or to the objection that the appellee is not named in. the order allowing the appeal.</p> <p>Where the appellee died after the argument of the motion to dismiss the appeal, the order on the motion was entered nunc pro tunc as of the day of the argument.</p>
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richardson's v. GreenSupreme Court· 1890-01-13· cited 118×
- Freeman v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1915-08-25· cited 59×
- Quon Quon Poy v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1927-02-21· cited 50×
- Jacobs v. GeorgeSupreme Court· 1893-11-27· cited 44×
- Evans v. State BankSupreme Court· 1890-03-17· cited 42×
- Teague v. Regional Commissioner of CustomsSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 26×
- Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WardSupreme Court· 1908-01-20· cited 21×
- Altenberg v. GrantSixth Circuit· 1897-05-24· cited 21×
- Burt v. C. Gotzian & Co.Eighth Circuit· 1900-07-02· cited 20×
- Preston v. FinleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas· 1896-03-09· cited 11×
- Middleton v. Dan River, Inc.M.D. Alabama· 1985-08-15· cited 10×
- Shults Bread Co. v. CommissionerBoard of Tax Appeals· 1928-01-26· cited 10×
- Blaffer v. New Orleans Water Supply Co.Fifth Circuit· 1908-03-31· cited 9×
- Hill v. Western Electric Co.Sixth Circuit· 1914-06-02· cited 9×
- American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. BarnettSecond Circuit· 1928-05-07· cited 8×
- Berliner Gramophone Co. v. SeamanFourth Circuit· 1901-05-07· cited 4×
- American State Bank of North Judson v. SurpriseSeventh Circuit· 1928-12-22· cited 3×
- Edgell v. FelderFifth Circuit· 1900-01-23· cited 3×
- Small v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1890-03-31· cited 2×
- Hoffman v. OwensNevada Supreme Court· 1909-07-15· cited 2×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1888-11-19· cited 95×
- Sage v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court· 1878-01-18· cited 56×
- Brown v. McConnellSupreme Court· 1888-01-30· cited 36×
- Hewitt v. FilbertSupreme Court· 1885-12-21· cited 33×
- Dodge v. KnowlesSupreme Court· 1885-04-20· cited 30×
- Thomas D. Owings, in Error v. Luke Tiernan's LesseeSupreme Court· 1836-01-18· cited 5×
- Van Rensselaer v. Watts's ExecutorsSupreme Court· 1849-03-12· cited 4×
- Alviso v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1867-01-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.