· 12/2/1977
Richardson v. Grand Central Corp.
Citations
- 572 P.2d 395
- 1977 Utah LEXIS 1323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, although one trial judge had denied the defendant's summary judgment motion, the second judge properly granted a directed verdict motion in favor of the defendant after the plaintiff had an opportunity to present his evidence at trial
- holding that, although one trial judge had denied the defendant‘s summary judgment motion, the second judge properly granted a directed verdict motion in favor of the defendant after the plaintiff had an opportunity to present his evidence at trial
- recognizing that the law of the case doctrine promotes judicial economy because it aids in \avoid[ing] the delays and the difficulties involved in repetitious contentions and rulings upon the same proposition in the same case\
- stating purpose of law of the case doctrine is “to avoid the delays and the difficulties involved in repetitious contentions and rulings upon the same proposition in the same case”
- stating purpose of law of the case doctrine is \to avoid the delays and the difficulties involved in repetitious contentions and rulings upon the same proposition in the same case\
- another judge from same court can consider same question of law if presented in a different light
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crockett, Ellett, Maughan, Wilkins, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.