Richardson v. Glass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that to support an action for legal malpractice, a plaintiff has the burden of showing not only counsel’s negligence, but also that the plaintiff would have recovered at trial in the underlying action
• “[The p]laintiff ha[s] the burden of not only proving her counsel’s negligence, but also that she would have recovered at trial in the underlying action.”
• “[The pjlaintiff ha[s] the burden of not only proving her counsel’s negligence, but also that she would have recovered at trial in the underlying action.”
• material facts set forth by moving party are deemed admitted unless specifically controverted
• material facts set forth by moving party are deemed admitted unless specifically controverted
• memorandum did not contain a concise statement of material facts as to which the party contended a dispute existed, the facts were not numbered, and the facts were not referenced with particularity to the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).