Richardson v. Germania Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “relief of this nature is reserved for rather extraordinary cases” and stating that “we employ a detailed analysis of various criteria” “when deciding whether prohibitory relief is appropriate”
• recognizing that \relief of this nature is reserved for rather extraordinary cases\ and stating that \we employ a detailed analysis of various criteria\ \when deciding whether prohibitory relief is appropriate\
• holding that “an application for the issuance or renewal of staff privileges that is created solely for consideration by a hospital credentialing committee is protected by the health care peer review privilege”
• defining “peer review” as “ ‘the procedure for evaluation by health care professionals of the quality and efficiency of services ordered or performed by other health care professionals . . .’” (quoting W. Va. Code § 30-3C-1 (1975))
• defining peer review as '\the procedure for evaluation by health care professionals of the quality and efficiency of services ordered or performed by other health care professionals . . . \' (quoting W. Va. Code § 30-3C-1 (1975))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).