Skip to main content
· 2/5/2010

Richardson v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.

Citations

  • 594 F.3d 69
  • 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1473
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2495
  • 2010 WL 396388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting evidence that restaurant manager’s “physical duties were reduced or shifted to other employees after she was injured” held “minimal value” as to whether those duties were essential
  • “It is not uncommon for ‘managers’ of small restaurants and retail stores to spend little of their time managing others.”
  • “ ‘[T]he law does not require an employer to accommodate a disability by foregoing an essential function of the position or by reallocating essential functions to make other workers’ jobs more onerous.’”
  • “[I]f an employer has a legitimate reason for specifying multiple duties for a particular job classification ..., a disabled employee will not be qualified for the position unless [s]he can perform enough of these duties to enable a judgment that [s]he can perform its essential duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Ebel, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.