Richardson v. Farrar
Citations
- 88 Va. 760
- 15 S.E. 117
- 1892 Va. LEXIS 30
Syllabus
<p>1. Contested Elections — Section 160 construed— Mandamus. — This statute commands that returns of county elections he, upon complaint by fifteen or more voters of undue election and false return, and counter-complaint, if any he filed, subject to the inquiry, determination and judgment of the county court, which shall proceed without a jury and on the testimony to decide the same upon the merits according to the constitution and the laws. In such a contest, the quashing and dismissal of a joint complaint- of undue election and false return against three at the same election, oil the ground of misjoinder of defendants;</p> <p>Held :</p> <p>Error because the statute does not limit the contest to one, and mandamus lies to compel the court to proceed to hear and determine the contest.</p> <p>2. Idem — Dilatory motions. — Whore complaint complies with the statutory requirements, and counter-complaint has been filed ; dilatory defences, held, to have been waived.</p>
Judges: Fauxtleroy, Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Penick v. RatcliffeCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1927-12-22· cited 50×
- State v. CobbsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1895-06-19· cited 33×
- In Re HoranSupreme Court of Virginia· 2006-01-19· cited 18×
- In Re Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2009-06-04· cited 14×
- Kirk v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia· 1960-11-28· cited 2×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court· 1831-03-18· cited 111×
- Ex Parte CuttingSupreme Court· 1877-01-15· cited 105×
- LIFE AND FIRE INS. COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. Wilson's HeirsSupreme Court· 1834-02-18· cited 87×
- Ex Parte NewmanSupreme Court· 1872-05-18· cited 75×
- Ex Parte BradstreetSupreme Court· 1833-03-13· cited 53×
- Nelms v. VaughanSupreme Court of Virginia· 1888-04-05· cited 42×
- Wise v. BiggerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1884-08-07· cited 37×
- Ex Parte Bradstreet v. HuntingtonSupreme Court· 1834-03-13· cited 19×
- Life & Fire Ins. Co. of NY v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1835-01-01· cited 17×
- Vaiden v. Stubblefield's ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia· 1877-02-15· cited 10×
- Douglass v. Stephenson's Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia· 1880-10-14· cited 8×
- Cowan v. DoddridgeSupreme Court of Virginia· 1872-07-16· cited 8×
- Town of Danville v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1885-01-08· cited 7×
- Moon's Administrator v. WellfordSupreme Court of Virginia· 1887-11-17· cited 6×
- Ex Parte William ManySupreme Court· 1853-03-18· cited 5×
- Ex parte CosterNew York Supreme Court· 1827-10-15· cited 3×
- People v. Judges of Chautauque Common PleasNew York Supreme Court· 1828-08-15· cited 2×
- State ex rel. Rudabeck v. LivseyNebraska Supreme Court· 1889-06-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.