· 7/14/2005
Richardson v. Easterling
Citations
- 878 A.2d 1212
- 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 379
- 2005 WL 1653859
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the legislative history of the Act indicates that the proponents recognized that domestic violence may include physical, sexual, or emotional violence, such as stalking
- rejecting 15 argument that CPO may not issue unless abuse or violence has been alleged; ―[W]e may not read into the Act limitations or restrictions which it does not contain.‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb and Farrell, Associate Judges, and Burgess, Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.