Skip to main content
· 7/14/2005

Richardson v. Easterling

Citations

  • 878 A.2d 1212
  • 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 379
  • 2005 WL 1653859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the legislative history of the Act indicates that the proponents recognized that domestic violence may include physical, sexual, or emotional violence, such as stalking
  • rejecting 15 argument that CPO may not issue unless abuse or violence has been alleged; ―[W]e may not read into the Act limitations or restrictions which it does not contain.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwelb and Farrell, Associate Judges, and Burgess, Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of Columbia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.