Skip to main content
· 7/27/1993

Richardson v. Diagnostic Rehabilitation Center

Citations

  • 836 F. Supp. 252
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10208
  • 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,135
  • 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 725
  • 1993 WL 453776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While a complaint accompanied by an i.f.p. motion is usually not deemed ‘filed’ until leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted or the filing fee is paid, the filing of the motion tolls the applicable statute of limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Giles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.