Richardson v. County of Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because there was no evidence that employer directed supervisor to assault claimant, suit against employer was barred
• claim based on intentional torts committed by co-employees barred by the exclusivity provision of the Act because the injuries were unexpected and unforseen by the plaintiff and not authorized by the employer
• \The mere allegation that defendants were acting within the scope of their authority 'is not equivalent to an allegation that [the employer] expressly authorized [them] to commit the specific acts in question.' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).