Richardson v. City of St. Louis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing dismissal where plaintiffs alleged that defendant E.M.T. had negligently treated him because the facts in the petition did not establish on their face that the defendant’s actions were discretionary
• “Missouri courts have routinely held . . . the plaintiff bears the burden of pleading with specificity facts giving rise to an exception to sovereign immunity when suing a public entity”
• “Missouri courts have routinely held that sovereign immunity is not an affirmative defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).