Skip to main content
· 12/23/1889

Richardson v. Butler

Citations

  • 82 Cal. 174
  • 23 P. 9
  • 1889 Cal. LEXIS 828

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • enforcing obligation that, though not expressly stated in divorce settlement agreement, was clearly implied from agreement’s express terms
  • reversing contempt order to the extent it directed ex-husband to execute a quitclaim deed to marital residence as remedy for failing to refinance or list it for sale
  • discretion of trial court as to amount of fees awarded under OCGA § 19-6-2 will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion
  • “‘[i]t is axiomatic that whenever possible, a contract should not be construed in a manner that renders any portion of it meaningless’”
  • “[W]henever possible, a contract should not be construed in a manner that renders any portion of it meaningless.”
  • “[A]n appellee ordinarily must file a cross-appeal to preserve a claim of error, except when the claim of error is material to, and intertwined with, a claim of error properly raised by the appellant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.