· 12/23/1889
Richardson v. Butler
Citations
- 82 Cal. 174
- 23 P. 9
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 828
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- enforcing obligation that, though not expressly stated in divorce settlement agreement, was clearly implied from agreement’s express terms
- reversing contempt order to the extent it directed ex-husband to execute a quitclaim deed to marital residence as remedy for failing to refinance or list it for sale
- discretion of trial court as to amount of fees awarded under OCGA § 19-6-2 will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion
- “‘[i]t is axiomatic that whenever possible, a contract should not be construed in a manner that renders any portion of it meaningless’”
- “[W]henever possible, a contract should not be construed in a manner that renders any portion of it meaningless.”
- “[A]n appellee ordinarily must file a cross-appeal to preserve a claim of error, except when the claim of error is material to, and intertwined with, a claim of error properly raised by the appellant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.