Richards v. Ware

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that one of the elements of a common-law indemnity claim is that “the [indemnity-] defendant was also liable to the third party”
• “ORCP 22 C(1) does not alter the substance of a contribution claim under ORS 31.800 or a common-law claim for indemnity. ORCP 22 is a procedural rule that affects the timing — not the elements — of third-party claims.” (Emphasis in original.)
• discussing process employed in similarly postured case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).