Richards v. State Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding imminent danger where plaintiff suffered paralysis, heart 11 palpitations, and chest pains after defendants denied psychiatric medication
• noting preference for parties to agree to accurate translation or, alternatively, to submit competing expert testimony on translation accuracy to jury
• stating, in case involving wiretapped recordings, that “[t]he Court Reporter Act is not usually understood to require the reporter to record separately the contents of exhibits admitted in evidence”
• discussing the admission of transcripts into evidence and citing cases affirming the practice
• “The language of the federal courts is English. Participants, including judges, jurors, and counsel, are entitled to understand the proceedings in English.”
• translation issue not before the court where party did not object to translation's accuracy below and made no claim on appeal that translation was inaccurate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).