Richards v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court was required to resolve disputed facts regarding reading of implied consent notice in denying motion to suppress
• “[I]t generally has been held that the erroneous admission of evidence of a defendant’s blood alcohol level in a case involving a conviction for driving with a prohibited alcohol level is harmful error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thompson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-09-15· cited 37×
• Sanders v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-11-14· cited 27×
• Daniel v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-06-08· cited 14×
• Furcal-Peguero v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-05-21· cited 14×
• State v. Moncrief
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-10-26· cited 11×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-07-16· cited 10×
• Smith v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-09-16· cited 7×
• Harrison v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-11-02· cited 5×
• McCafferty v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-01-24· cited 2×
• Richards v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-06-25

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richards v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-03-06· cited 12×
• Hamilton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-01-08· cited 12×
• Parrish v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-03-23· cited 6×