Richards v. Schmidt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant-employee could not defend against his breach of a \perfectly valid\ employment contract (the embezzlement of grain from the plaintiff-employer
• holding that defendant- employee could not defend against his breach of a “perfectly valid” employment contract (the embezzlement of grain from the plaintiff-employer
• holding that a contract is not void if the alleged “illegal act” that the contract was connected to did “not form any link in plaintiff’s chain of title to [the property] or the money, or constitute any part of its cause of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).