Richards v. Richards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Certainly, when a former wife remarries, the divorced husband does not concern himself with any legal distinctions between void and voidable. She has married. He is free.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ehrenworth v. Ehrenworth
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-10-07· cited 9×
• Joye v. Yon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-08-25· cited 6×
• Dolberry v. Dolberry
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-12-10· cited 2×
• Smith v. Smith
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-05-24· cited 2×
• Joye v. Yon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gaines v. Jacobsen
  New York Court of Appeals· 1954-12-31· cited 80×
• Flaxman v. Flaxman
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-02-08· cited 44×
• Berkely v. Berkely
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-02-20· cited 17×
• Fry v. Fry
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-03-10· cited 15×
• Denberg v. Frischman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1965-11-04· cited 13×
• Ferreira v. Lyons
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-11-28· cited 10×
• Minder v. Minder
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1964-03-23· cited 9×
• Sharpe v. Sharpe
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-02-08· cited 7×
• Denberg v. Frischman
  New York Court of Appeals· 1966-04-28· cited 7×
• Hansen v. Fredo
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-03-29· cited 5×